InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RDY2ROCK

01/10/17 11:43 PM

#128274 RE: Gold49er #128272

*****OUTSTANDING***** post!!!!! You ROCK 49er! ;-)

2017 will be an AWESOME year for SFOR! The turnaround started in 2016 and will continue to get better throughout 2017 as REVs continue to increase and more litigation settlements and/or wins! ;-)
icon url

Imokhopeur

01/11/17 8:31 AM

#128288 RE: Gold49er #128272

Dang 9er! That's good stuff my friend.
Thanks
icon url

Gold Maker

01/11/17 9:26 AM

#128290 RE: Gold49er #128272

49er, I will use my once daily allowable post to thank you for your awesome and informative posts. It's people like you, Sledd, ZPaul, and a handfull of others, that really make this board enjoyable to read. Keep up the good work guys, which I have no doubt that your efforts will not be in vain, and that soon we will prevail. Everything will arrive in due time my friends. GLTA
icon url

WBCTrader

01/11/17 10:02 AM

#128301 RE: Gold49er #128272

Where is the fact that they can pass a vendor due dilligence ffiec guidelines?

Its a fact that their protect ID coupled with oracle oaam or rsa adaptive authentication risk based authentications complies with FFIEC requirements for multifactor authentication.

That is straight from your post.

the internet banking mulitifactor authentication requirements are completely different than FFIEC requirements on Vendor DD. You know that. Quit trying to mislead.


SFOR WILL NOT PASS FFIEC REQUIREMENTS FOR A VENDOR. Go to the page yourself and read the vetting process.

Completely different topic than what you posted.