Yes Mac, it has to be dual. There is no other explanation, not only because of the data, but because of the quote that the compound has achieved "cellular homeostasis". A scientist or CEO cannot state that without knowing that this is occurring at the cellular level (ERP confirmation) and no one would stake a reputation (and lawsuit...as in "phony pump") if this were not the absolute case. If it was even possible this was a fluke NO ONE would ever say cellular homeostasis has been achieved! It has been achieved(!) or else someone would have called this out. Now they point instead to "it's only been achieved in 25 patients or less, too small." It has been achieved and sustained thus far.
And good for you - you saw this and called it long ago!!! Great deduction, imo:)