Replies to post #68892 on iTalk Inc. (fka TALK)

[1manband]

Looks like they are getting a pass because of the BK 11. Anyone can see that.

Show me the specific language in either the '33 or '34 Act which permits a bankrupt company to cease reporting to the SEC while a subsidiary (not even the SEC registered parent) is in bankruptcy.

Here is a hint.......there isn't one. TALK is not only delinquent, they are seriously delinquent. And there is absolutely no legitimate excuse for their failure to file. The SEC will suspend the stock and revoke their registration for failure to file. And it will be sooner than many think.

[integral]

Exchange Act of '34, nor does Regulation S-X provide an exemption for BK.

Dea or Levy inferring such is deceitful.

Period!

[rbtree]

Looks like they are getting a pass because of the BK 11. Anyone can see that.

Beyond preposterous.

Doesn't much matter at this time..... A few ticks from no bid, and soon UMS will no longer be an asset.

Why should they ever bother to file?