InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

diannedawn

12/13/16 5:09 PM

#35231 RE: TJG #35230

OH DEAR!!! I AM SHAKING IN MY BOOTS!!!

"It was decided that the Company will not enact any type of reverse split at this time. However, the Company is still required to close at a minimum price of $0.01 per share for a period of ten consecutive trading days on or before close of business October 12, 2015. This is a listing requirement for companies to maintain a listing on the OTCQB market. Once the Company files its 2015 Form 10-K, the minimum closing price requirement still applies and non-compliance with such regulation could result in the Company being unable to regain its OTCQB status. If necessary the Board has approved a reverse stock split solely for the purpose of meeting the OTCQB minimum closing price requirement. It is important to note, however, that if a reverse stock split is implemented, the number of shares the Company is authorized to issue, which was recently increased to 2.5 billion will be reduced by the same ratio as the reverse stock split in order the minimize the potential for dilution in the future."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tauriga-sciences-inc-issues-shareholder-120000153.html


Didn't Berman say something about Board meetings not taking place or proper procedures not being followed...something like that???
WERE YOU ABSENT FOR THIS VOTE???
OR JUST TOO ABSENT MINDED TO RECALL THIS???


I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR FROM THE SEC...
I GARANTEE I COULD GIVE THEM AN EARFUL!!!


What a JOKE!
This is almost as good as your claim that the venue change was DENIED.
ROTFLMAO

and by the way dimbulb...
the weather outside is frightful
but whether or not you are an idiot?
THERE IS NO DEBATE.

It's INCREDIBLE that Seth Shaw picked such an ignorant FOOL to be a board member.
icon url

diannedawn

12/13/16 5:42 PM

#35246 RE: TJG #35230

OH DEAR!!! I AM SHAKING IN MY BOOTS!!!

"It was decided that the Company will not enact any type of reverse split at this time. However, the Company is still required to close at a minimum price of $0.01 per share for a period of ten consecutive trading days on or before close of business October 12, 2015. This is a listing requirement for companies to maintain a listing on the OTCQB market. Once the Company files its 2015 Form 10-K, the minimum closing price requirement still applies and non-compliance with such regulation could result in the Company being unable to regain its OTCQB status. If necessary the Board has approved a reverse stock split solely for the purpose of meeting the OTCQB minimum closing price requirement. It is important to note, however, that if a reverse stock split is implemented, the number of shares the Company is authorized to issue, which was recently increased to 2.5 billion will be reduced by the same ratio as the reverse stock split in order the minimize the potential for dilution in the future."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tauriga-sciences-inc-issues-shareholder-120000153.html


Didn't Berman say something about Board meetings not taking place or proper procedures not being followed...something like that???
WERE YOU ABSENT FOR THIS VOTE???
OR JUST TOO ABSENT MINDED TO RECALL THIS???


I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR FROM THE SEC...
I GARANTEE I COULD GIVE THEM AN EARFUL!!!

What a JOKE!
This is almost as good as your claim that the venue change was DENIED.
ROTFLMAO
icon url

rawman

12/13/16 11:46 PM

#35260 RE: TJG #35230


Took a screenshot of that and will be looking into this. I want to see if its an attempt to deceive the market and drive the price down. Drive it down with information that you can not possibly have, legally that is.


Wow...it didn't take long for Mr. BOD, Thomas Graham, aka TJG, to renege on the promise to only provide objectivity to the investors! This entire post is rife with completely "editorial" observations!

NOT ONLY IS THE POST AN OPINION, NOT FACT, BUT IT IMPLIES THAT AN IHUB POSTER IS GUILTY OF STOCK PRICE MANIPULATION! LOL...HOPEFULLY TAUG'S OFFICER AND DIRECTOR INSURANCE IS CURRENT!

Once again, Mr. BOD has demonstrated that he cannot be trusted to provide objective information to the investors! BIG SURPRISE! It has only been a matter of a few days and Mr. BOD's lack of self-control has once again won out! Isn't it really special when an INDEPENDENT Director has no clue as to his role! It certainly has to make the retail shareholders feel good! Wow!
icon url

seifer1975

12/14/16 6:45 AM

#35271 RE: TJG #35230

The timing of a pronouncement regarding a BOD meeting approving a R/S is very odd if true. Seems an attempt to scare sellers. If there was a recent event it should be looked in to. It might just be banter, but it could cross a line if inside info is being used to scare shareholders. In the whole big picture who cares, except for the fact that someone the Board of Directors trusts is back stabbing leaking information.

There could be a concerted effort by MM to try to make the stock go down. If they are trading just 5,000,000 shares a month at a .002 profit that is a profit of 10g's a month. I doubt anyone believes that a press release over a year and a half ago would have relevance today.
icon url

diannedawn

12/14/16 10:14 AM

#35295 RE: TJG #35230

ROTFLMAO...

"the Company obtained Board of Director approval for a 1 for 8 reverse split under the condition that its authorized shares would also be reduced by the same ratio. "

OH DEAR!

But but but what about Sethie's PROMISE to get back on the QB???

Building fundamental value???

Pfsssft!
icon url

johnny8544

12/14/16 12:25 PM

#35307 RE: TJG #35230

You stated Dianne should not have posted that the board approved a reverse split. You stated "You can not state that the Board of Directors has done something that can effect the price of a stock. You can slam me, Seth and the company, you can give an opinion on this or that. But you can not make a blatant statement that the Board has enacted something,something that has as much impact as a Reverse Split, weather true or not."

But now we see that they in fact have done so-- see today's PR in which they state the board did approve such a split and then go on to say split approved but will not be done but instead will try to improve value of company. Fact: split was approved so Dianne was correct.

Here's the link http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/tauriga-sciences-inc-updates-shareholders-on-efforts-to-uplist-to-otcqb-tier-pinksheets-taug-2183060.htm

Here's the quote:

"In response, the Company obtained Board of Director approval for a 1 for 8 reverse split under the condition that its authorized shares would also be reduced by the same ratio. The Company believes that it would likely be successful in its efforts to uplist under this method.

However, after carefully contemplating the available options, the Company has decided that it will not enact a reverse stock split and will focus on building its fundamental value as well as prosecuting its ongoing federal lawsuit against Cowan Gunteski. The Company is hopeful that it will be successful in choosing this path forward."

So right now all taug has is hope?