InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bobbyinredwood

12/12/16 2:02 PM

#11584 RE: rbtree #11583

I found a video of the feasibility study for you. Enjoy!
icon url

Gene_Simmons

12/12/16 2:41 PM

#11586 RE: rbtree #11583

Goro and McEwen Mining did the same thing if I am not mistaken... Worked out well for them. And MarMar has wandered the ground for a long, long time. They know what is there.
icon url

TMLonggun

12/12/16 2:53 PM

#11587 RE: rbtree #11583

Humans have mined obviously economic mineral deposits for ten thousand years without feasibility studies. The allure of Mexus isn't that you need a geology degree to sit and number crunch for a year to get a super small margin project that we have to nickel and dime to somehow scrape a living out of. This is an obviously economic project with huge nuggets and quartz veins loaded with visible gold. This is a bonanza property that could have been mined with or without modern technology and still earn its owners a large profit. With several months/years of outlined resources that are so high grade compared to all the nearby profitable mines it is pure common sense that if the neighbours go to the center of the earth for low grade and make a lot of cash doing it Mexus can scrape MUCH richer ore 1 cm off the surface and move it 1-5% of the distance to their circuit. If this doesn't lead to profits for Mexus relative to its peers I will eat my hat.

they can not claim the resource has proven reserves.


True but it also does not stop them from mining it at a profit. In some rare cases, if you have an obviously economic deposit, it makes far more sense to do minimal outlining and produce rather than wasting millions to prove what is obviously there and then producing. A great example of this is GORO - backed by many of the same investors as MXSG with a very similar development thesis. They caught a lot of flak for their decisions but they succeeded in developing a profitable mine for a small part of the usual cost. 110 million dollars in dividends paid - more than lifetime exploration spending.

One day Mexus will have proven and probable 43-101 compliant reserves but it is apparent that if you wait for the stock to become 100% proven and take no risk you will pay substantially more for you shares. The exploration risk for Mexus is quite low, probably the lowest of any junior I am aware of. Mexus has an absurd amount of economic gold on their property. Is it one million or ten million ounces? I don't know but one thing is certain: it is enough to keep them busy for a long time and more than enough to make us all rich.
icon url

Amadeus4153

12/12/16 6:18 PM

#11593 RE: rbtree #11583

"Also, because of the above, I tend to think the stock price, as it reflects an appx $100m market cap, is somewhat overextended. Perhaps that's an indication of why the stock slumped so much this morning on the news which showed that production would be delayed into January."

The stock slumped this morning due to day traders closing out their very short-term positions. Those day traders had joined up last week and the week prior due to expectations of an announcement of a first pour coming this week. When the PR this morning clarified that the production would be delayed into January, those day traders took their short-term money elsewhere.

This stock is hardly overextended. Please clarify on what technical or fundamental basis why you would state so.
icon url

eddyimano

12/13/16 2:14 AM

#11609 RE: rbtree #11583

There are some serious talk here. It sounds like truth will be justified. I am waiting for the time MXSG to prove they are the real deal. In Jan., we will know more. All we can do is research and study what exactly is, but that is nothing anyway till the real deal.