InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

A_Good_Day_2

12/11/16 4:18 PM

#83389 RE: Amatuer17 #83385

True...but trying to low-ball might be a huge gamble. It could ruin your chances of closing the deal. It could get rejected, or outbid by a competitor.
icon url

BCCHoosier

12/11/16 4:35 PM

#83395 RE: Amatuer17 #83385

If $30 is accepted as an offer I'd be really upset. That would be the steal of the century.
icon url

stockaesthetics

12/11/16 4:39 PM

#83396 RE: Amatuer17 #83385

Or they could get a "white squire" (i.e. John Paulson etc) to get a controlling stake to ward off a black knight. There are theories that this happened in the spring with another stock I'm invested in (SGYP), where it is rumored that Allergan was attempting a hostile takeover, and Paulson simultaneously purchased 20-30 million shares to ward off a potentially low hostile takeover price.
icon url

XenaLives

12/11/16 4:56 PM

#83397 RE: Amatuer17 #83385

Shareholders have to approve... Insiders hold a significant number of shares, institutions at this point show about 13%, and I doubt that they are over 20% at the end of the year.

Then we have the ATM offering which could also go to friendly hands if institutions start buying a lot

I don't think anyone will be pulling a fast one on Missling.



icon url

Rubyred77

12/11/16 5:13 PM

#83399 RE: Amatuer17 #83385

There is a poison pill, dig deeper and you'll find it. There's a lot of authorized shares than can be released in such a scenario.