InvestorsHub Logo

pack10

12/07/16 1:33 PM

#123602 RE: Prudent Capitalist #123601

It is confusing, takes careful reading, but you are totally correct. Good job.

24601

12/07/16 2:21 PM

#123604 RE: Prudent Capitalist #123601

You're doing a service by clarifying that the decision of the Supreme Court was on the proper measures of damages, not on liability. They did not let Samsung off the hook for infringing on Apple's design patent. They sent the case back to the court below for re-assessment of the damage award. But as long as you're at it, why not clarify as well that what Samsung is liable for is infringing, not "stealing and infringing."




.

Dunlop

12/07/16 6:37 PM

#123607 RE: Prudent Capitalist #123601

This the same one?