InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 147224
Next 10
Followers 135
Posts 17960
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 05/28/2009

Re: Dunlop post# 123600

Wednesday, 12/07/2016 1:30:55 PM

Wednesday, December 07, 2016 1:30:55 PM

Post# of 147224
No. the U. S. supreme Court found that Samsung had infringed on the patents, but that Samsung did not owe Apple for the total amount of its profits from the phones I nquestion, because it found that Samsung had only stolen and infringed on certain aspects and portions of the technology and not the entire iPhone. So, it sent the case back for further proceedings to determine the correct amount of damages Samsung has to pay.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/06/technology/samsung-apple-smartphone-patent-supreme-court.html?_r=0
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AAPL News