I see this was published in 2012 so it it's likely my guy read this. This was also the gist of the recent link I posted from the researchers at IBM - scale-up reproducibility.
What I wonder is did Anil have any realization of this problem. His doctorate is in chemical engineering and it would seem this is a problem in that domain.
I will continue to follow the price as the best single piece of evidence.It does not take a Ph.D in technical analysis to see it's in a steady down trend with downside targets in the 60 - 75 cent range. I expect the down trend to be interrupted for a time at about 1.00 +/- 10 cents. It's not only an important psychological price barrier but the stock has gotten support in the zone of 90 cents to 1.10 going as far back as 2007 on four occasions.
When that support breaks it is be a final signal of high importance. It will say the market has given up on the stock in a long-term sense. But this would not preclude a significant upside bounce associated with a short-squeeze.
I believe that management will attempt to exploit the large short position early in 2017 to engineer enough of a price rise to do a final PIPE. We have seen the market is quite skeptical of NNVC news announcements and with good reason. Gene is going to have to really top himself to pull this off. But that's the genius of Gene. He is capable of doing that. That is his expertise.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
