There are analysts that have been researching/following Kraig, since the PNAS...EXTREMELY impressed with the science/disruptive nature of the technology, and HUGE POTENTIAL MARKET(even with modest penetration).
However, very unimpressed with thompson's business acumen.
Here's a quote from the latest email I received, "I believe Kim Thompson's legal background is a hindrance, rather than an asset."
With all due respect,I find the "soon enough" comments...to be very disappointing ...totally relative,subjective, ambiguous, and meaningless.
I know people of very "limited means"...that due to my belief in Kraig's ultimate success...have invested in Kraig..."soon enough", for them...doesn't mean year after year of thompson's TOTAL DISREGARD FOR SHAREHOLDERS("lip service" regarding improved communication...absolutely no understanding/efficacy in protecting/bolstering Kraig's currency/stock)...
The NAIVETE of believing that shareholders appear ANYWHERE on thompson's priority list...is beyond my comprehension...
As I have said many times...thompson is behaving EXACTLY like what he is... a TYPICAL ATTORNEY...legal ethics, is an oxymoron...
The very best to Kraig, and all longs