InvestorsHub Logo

MasterBlastr

11/29/16 5:25 PM

#31224 RE: Hugodrax #31223

Thanks, Hugo. Good to see someone taking time to explain how things work, even if most still don't get it.

Strategyone

11/29/16 6:17 PM

#31225 RE: Hugodrax #31223

It is amazing how short sighted these arguments are and how many holes there are in it.

I wish you luck in your absolute outcome fantasy. You should definitely short as much of this as you can.

Fangster

11/29/16 6:17 PM

#31226 RE: Hugodrax #31223

Amazing that few here actually get this... yes, debt holders will own Suneq if it emerges. The bond and equity prices show this.

Interest in Suneq is waning more and more each day. Perhaps some of the fervent longs may have finally let this reality sink in as we're not hearing from them anymore.

Handyman4545

11/30/16 1:28 PM

#31238 RE: Hugodrax #31223

You're apparently missing my point.
I'm personally not interested in SUN beyond its emergence from chapter 11.
Whether it ever generates long term profit or not makes no difference to me.
I'm interested in a break even or profit on my eventual shares sellout which is based solely and entirely upon Sun's emergence with shares intact and pricing at or above $5/shr.

If Sun emerges with existing shares dissolved, I loose anyway.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
If they emerge with existing shares intact and at price, I win and thus far, I have seen nothing indicating directly that they intend to dissolve the existing shares.

Assets & debts aside, continued investment in operation of the company is not in my personal best interests.

Have you found anything to date, that states a dissolution of existing shares?