InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

riskreward007

11/18/16 8:12 PM

#118462 RE: Gold Maker #118461

To me that's the most logical guess so far.

But can you really restrict information provided at a public shareholder meeting?
icon url

4sleddogs

11/18/16 8:15 PM

#118463 RE: Gold Maker #118461

It's possible that SFOR counsel advised SH that they are not company spokesmen and could be held liable for spreading inaccurate info by any means.
icon url

Pennydream

11/18/16 8:17 PM

#118464 RE: Gold Maker #118461

Lol kay would get in trouble with sec if he did that . Maybe there is just nothing to talk about
icon url

Koog

11/18/16 8:17 PM

#118465 RE: Gold Maker #118461

Maybe those that attended get priviledge information and they can't share it.


That would be a blatant violation of Regulation FD:

Fair Disclosure, Regulation FD

Regulation FD addresses the selective disclosure of information by publicly traded companies and other issuers. Regulation FD provides that when an issuer discloses material nonpublic information to certain individuals or entities—generally, securities market professionals, such as stock analysts, or holders of the issuer's securities who may well trade on the basis of the information—the issuer must make public disclosure of that information. In this way, Regulation FD aims to promote the full and fair disclosure.


http://www.sec.gov/answers/regfd.htm
icon url

Crazy Money

11/18/16 9:49 PM

#118488 RE: Gold Maker #118461

If unusual HUGE buying or selling Monday @ the open then maybe... lolzzz... really doubt Kay is that dumb... but seen it with other pinkies where people go to a shareholder meeting and the following day after... BOOOM goes da STOCK up... without reason ;-) - I can think of a specific stock from the past that ran from .0006 to .175zzz where that would happen... lololo - it was like that anyone that went to the shareholder meeting was convinced to buy all they could and get all friends and family and anyone they could to join in... :-D ;-) :-)