Replies to post #114882 on Zerify Inc (ZRFY)

[whynot1790]

Everything said here is speculation and opinions. So can't trust anyone's post except your own DD. So when anyone posts anything without an up to date link that's all it is .

[zatafour]

Increased my bid @ 005 just in case there are some unhappy shareholders that want to sell..

[moneym8ker]

Sheesh...

"If the company was worth something, they'd be bought up by now"

It's nonsense like that which tells me some here, truly are blinded by the sparks of the axe their grinding.

SFOR is worth something...

Right now, they're worth about $1 million bucks (im pretty sure that their 10Q will show that's what they have in the bank) and they're also worth around $500k in revenues from product sales/licensing.
So...
All told, they're worth about $1.5 million and that's being gracious...for a company to realize that vale, they'd have to be able to make that $500k in annual revenue without it costing $2million like it does SFOR every year.

Now we can all argue patent value, licensing value, infringement pipe dream values but that just isn't how it works.

You go buy a car. It's advertised at $20k.
You walk in the dealership and the dealer says "a super famous worldwide phenom MAY also buy that very car" and so now, even though its listed at $20k, he says you have to pay $100k because that phenom "might, maybe, could" be seen in it later and so the value "might, maybe, could" go up.

Would you still buy that car?

If you say yes, I've got a car for sale.

Bottom line here is that while I like SFOR, there are a few things I don't like:

1.) it's way over valued based on every FUNDAMENTAL KNOWN fact and yes, you have to completely remove the speculation from the FUNDAMENTALS... that's why they're called FUNDAMENTALS!

2.) while I respect that a CEO steers clear of the day to day stock prices, I don't appreciate a CEO who watches 75% of his market cap disappear without a word to the broad shareholder base via a press release.

3.) SFOR is a catalyst play. They run on good news, and they bleed red between catalysts...if SFOR would have used a portion of their MSFT handout to improve the share structure it would have provided firmament to the share price...
They opted to not do that.

SFOR is, by share price, priced as a company that's a micro cap $11 million, when in truth, they're actually a $1.5 million dollar company.

They're over valued.
When the price comes in, I'll be a buyer.

Insert "not a car salesman" smiley face here