Replies to post #24890 on Cardinal Resources Inc fka CDNL

[powerinnumbers]

HMM. So now breaking information from an anonymous source that Cardinal did not receive the initial 1.16 million in exchange for 11 million shares as was reported via 8k on May 5, 2016. I call bul$h*t.

[crookedneck]

I can understand why a so called insider would want to remain anonymous when it is clear that this info violates several SEC regulations and could cause one to be fined greatly and possibly jailed, but as to why they would take the huge gamble to share it in the first place doesn't make any sense. What possible incentive would there be for anyone to take such a huge gamble to share something like that? It would be absolutely crazy for anyone to knowingly share what is clearly insider information and then asking to remain anonymous! It would be even more crazy for the person who received the insider information to share it on a social media site, because he would be setting himself up for a huge fall, since he says he knows who it is, but will not name his insider source! Hard for anyone to believe what doesn't make sense or lacks credibility! Cheers!