in perry, lamberth ruled that the facts dont matter based on his interpretation of HERA, that a conservator effectively can do whatever they want and has no fiduciary duty to shareholders
there was never an administrative record produced and pratt/pagliara/robinson all fell in line.
that is up for appeal. subsequently, docs were produced demonstrably proving the incompleteness of the admin record, which ginsburg finds relevant
he could only find it relevant based on a plaintiff favorable interpretation of HERA
your assertions continue to have no merit most of the time