Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[big-yank]

So plaintiffs admit that the discovery documents crucial to the Perry Appeal must be provided from the unrelated Fairholme suit or the Perry decision may be prejudiced? Why didn't the Perry attorneys pursue discovery for those documents?

Doesn't this plaintiff admission absolutely PROVE why the government's appeal of the Motion to Compel is 100% slam-dunk valid?

Why of course it does. Thanks, Glen.

JMHO.