InvestorsHub Logo

big-yank

10/28/16 8:34 AM

#357756 RE: navycmdr #357752

I expect the appeal will rule in favor of government because the documents in question have no relevancy to the takings claims that underpin the Fairholme complaint. Establishing "why" a taking took place is not a requirement to rule on whether a taking either did or did not occur.

I further believe that an in camera/in chamber review of the document cache will conclusively establish this in very short order, explaining government's willingness to immediately provide them without reservation to the Court of Appeals.

JMHO.

Zargis

10/28/16 8:54 AM

#357758 RE: navycmdr #357752

Thanks for posting this.

I was unaware of the DOJ getting involved. Being that top officials in the DOJ and other agencies are held by Obama administration choices, this lack of transparency does not surprise me.

This is concerning more than it is reassuring.

Be well,
-Zargis