InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PacificNW

10/27/16 12:31 PM

#81008 RE: Rkmatters #81007

Yes thanks but I just can't wrap my head around all the PR's and communication we used to get years gone by and the promises made and fast forward to where we are today with the dome of silence. At one time they used to ignore AF, then they argued via PR's with him and now they ignore everyone and anything no matter whether they be pro company or basher.
My own personal history with lawyers isn't very positive and I have often witnessed the ploy of least said the better when there is nothing positive to say and that herein lies my concern in a nut shell. I hate attorney speak or in this case nonspeaak aka silence.
icon url

RuleofK

10/27/16 12:54 PM

#81019 RE: Rkmatters #81007

It appears they have put themselves in a jam. How many shares will put the previous investors over 20%? If 10 million shares are offered o this new investor, 5 million shares will need to be accessible to the earlier investor.

At 14 million, 7 million would have had to be accessible. At 115 to 120 million shares outstanding 20% is around22 to 24 million shares. Who is this earlier investor with enough shares (15 million) that 7 million additional shares would put them at greater than 20% ownership.

This earlier investor will have to be considered for any future raise until the terms of the deal are met(1 year?). How will they be able to raise funds without violating Nasdaq rules?
Also per their S3As, they are limited to about $10 million per event. Does this look about right?