Replies to post #99268 on Zerify Inc (ZRFY)

[Kramden1]

Have You Read the 698 patent?

I have.

It's a VERY LONG and esoteric read, but very interesting nonetheless.

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=8&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=8,484,698&OS=8,484,698&RS=8,484,698

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

I like this specific part (talk about covering your AUTHentication bases !!!)

This is in contradistinction to present authentication processes as the out-of-band security network 40 is isolated from the corporate network 38 and does not depend thereon for validating data. The first shows a biometric validation which, in this case, is in the form of voice recognition and is within voice network 42. While voice recognition is used herein, it is merely exemplary of many forms of recognizing or identifying an individual person. Others include, but are not limited to fingerprint identification, iris recognition, retina identification, palms recognition, and face recognition. Each of these are similar to the first embodiment in that these are a requirement for monitoring the particular parameter of the individual person; including the parameter to a mathematical representation or algorithm therefore; retrieving a previously stored sample (biometric data), thereof from a database and comparing the stored sample with the input of the accessor.

[ShortTornado]

This is cutting edge technology it is not outdated. SFOR is coming into its prime with these patents. SFOR is going to win these lawsuits and Microsoft was not a fluke just a stepping stone..JMO of course. Everyone has one.......

[Kramden1]

You might want to check the list of companies infringing!!! Outdated????? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, I think not! SFOR