InvestorsHub Logo

jarenawer

10/08/16 8:29 AM

#355649 RE: big-yank #355647

Hahaha so much BS

schnabel

10/08/16 9:29 AM

#355656 RE: big-yank #355647

You should not be so absolute in your condemnation of Wikileaks. One day they may release information that is very important to you in some way and then they'll be your hero. Like they say freedoms come with certain baggage but the pro's far out weigh the cons.

Zmarzz

10/08/16 9:37 AM

#355657 RE: big-yank #355647

One other thing about Judge Sweeney's ruling.
It is my sense that she saw at least 1 document among the 50+ she reviewed that would be considered a "bombshell" if it were made public.
We have 2 scenarios here: 1) The documents corroborate the government's position. 2) At least 1 of the documents has the potential to severely damage the the government's legal position.
In the first scenario, the judge would simply have advised the government to make everything public now and clear the deck, so to speak. In the second scenario, she would have been bitterly critical of the government for trying every subterfuge possible to keep the document(s) hidden from the plaintiffs.
It is clear that Judge Sweeney worded her ruling per the second scenario!!!