InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 93
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/17/2016

Re: big-yank post# 355647

Saturday, 10/08/2016 9:37:40 AM

Saturday, October 08, 2016 9:37:40 AM

Post# of 796074
One other thing about Judge Sweeney's ruling.
It is my sense that she saw at least 1 document among the 50+ she reviewed that would be considered a "bombshell" if it were made public.
We have 2 scenarios here: 1) The documents corroborate the government's position. 2) At least 1 of the documents has the potential to severely damage the the government's legal position.
In the first scenario, the judge would simply have advised the government to make everything public now and clear the deck, so to speak. In the second scenario, she would have been bitterly critical of the government for trying every subterfuge possible to keep the document(s) hidden from the plaintiffs.
It is clear that Judge Sweeney worded her ruling per the second scenario!!!