Saturday, October 08, 2016 9:37:40 AM
It is my sense that she saw at least 1 document among the 50+ she reviewed that would be considered a "bombshell" if it were made public.
We have 2 scenarios here: 1) The documents corroborate the government's position. 2) At least 1 of the documents has the potential to severely damage the the government's legal position.
In the first scenario, the judge would simply have advised the government to make everything public now and clear the deck, so to speak. In the second scenario, she would have been bitterly critical of the government for trying every subterfuge possible to keep the document(s) hidden from the plaintiffs.
It is clear that Judge Sweeney worded her ruling per the second scenario!!!
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM