The 698 patent and associated patents are for 2fa OOB Biometrics... and I have read them.
Linked post exudes intentional misrepresentation.. because
The patent that was sold and has other "licensing" stipulations that we have not seen the details concerning... is for keyboard encryption. And has nothing to do with the current damages being sought... they are not even the same patents.
Why would Blank Rome walk into a court room for damages on a patent that we did not own.... ON CONTINGENCY FEE STRUCTURE?
QUOTE from patent
*************************************************************
This is in contradistinction to present authentication processes as the out-of-band security network 40 is isolated from the corporate network 38 and does not depend thereon for validating data. The first shows a biometric validation which, in this case, is in the form of voice recognition and is within voice network 42. While voice recognition is used herein, it is merely exemplary of many forms of recognizing or identifying an individual person. Others include, but are not limited to fingerprint identification, iris recognition, retina identification, palms recognition, and face recognition. Each of these are similar to the first embodiment in that these are a requirement for monitoring the particular parameter of the individual person; including the parameter to a mathematical representation or algorithm therefore; retrieving a previously stored sample (biometric data), thereof from a database and comparing the stored sample with the input of the accessor.
Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments herein detailed in accordance with the descriptive requirement of the law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
*************************************************
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
