InvestorsHub Logo

stockdawg44

09/28/16 11:28 AM

#76492 RE: lt2211 #76491

just flipping em.....daily momo runners....glta

raja48185

09/28/16 11:36 AM

#76498 RE: lt2211 #76491

I agree with you partially, but one has to take the first few steps to walk and this is another step in the right direction towards a partnership.

I am beginning to think the scope of this drug for various CNS ailments and is really mind boggling.

Keep the faith - long and strong

2014turnaround

09/28/16 11:38 AM

#76499 RE: lt2211 #76491

This gives the company credibility and says Adam F pretty much is a fraud hello! If Biogen is satisfied with their findings, it's EITHER a partnership or a buyout,damn some people are slow or in denial!

Millstone

09/28/16 11:39 AM

#76500 RE: lt2211 #76491

This agreement with Biogen is the most important news for Anavex since the 5 week results in the 2-73 Phase IIa showed a positive response.

Why? Validation, plain and simple. Like the validation of a 3rd party such as the Michael J. Fox Foundation studying A2-73.

But this is even bigger on a corporate level.

Third-Party interest changes everything. When that interest is one of the biggest, most respected biotechs in the world - it is a seismic shift in perception.

Almost certain the agreement with Biogen allows Biogen first dibs on negotiating rights to A2-73 for MS.

Anavex has publicly entered the big leagues today. Not to say there won't be volatility and bashing etc., but make no mistake that this is more significant on a corporate level than anything in perhaps the history of the company.

BP moves together. Others will be sniffing around.

Millstone

LakeshoreLeo1953

09/28/16 11:44 AM

#76507 RE: lt2211 #76491

It.....

You are very accurate, however

Stocks do not necessarily trade on reality alone.

Those who thought they had a dragon by the tale @ $4.50
may not be flush by EOD.

It is, however a START after many poorly communicated "events"
to date for AVXL.

Nice to have trade able volume again.......

shub

09/28/16 12:56 PM

#76538 RE: lt2211 #76491

agreed...not significant.