If that was read on LQMT's website, as opposed to Eon's, that would give information everyone has read about, more credibility?
I'm indifferent on Stiepp and only because what is going on with this Company, no one will see, or cite, anywhere else, but if that's the analysis - more "credibility" because it's on Eon's website, then he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. Under the proper analysis, doesn't it not mean a thing until it actually happens and value is created?
Words mean nothing until value is created. In fact, my understanding is that's Stiepp has actually contradicted some "pumpy" proclamations. They haven't pumped in print (aka "in the midst") in a long while, as much as they haven't pumped with spoken words either to the point many, I think, are wondering, "What the heck is going on???" So, now that Eon makes some "bold" pronouncements, it's, "Why didn't Stiepp tell LQMT shareholders?" If LQMT did that on their website, it would then be "Yeah??? Well, where the hell are the revenues?!?!?!"
It's like a dog chasing its tail...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
