I read it entirely and he missed every single point, got it all wrong, and as usual spoke about stuff he didn't understand what so ever. I've put out several posts stating what was in the Presentation Slides and what their significance is. He misunderstood how they came up with expected survival for the top 30% of patients in the trial and didn't even bother trying to look at the referenced study by MD Anderson nor the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score for phase I patients upon which the survival expectations were based. The expected survivals were for ONLY those 30%, and were done after looking at the data, and going back and putting in the variables for those particular patients, not for every patient in the cohort.