What are you going to say when your latest Chilean court fiasco ends up getting thrown out or is a loss (and it will be one or the other....most likely TOSSED)?? Your really running out of "EXCUSE avenues".....REAL FAST.
OH and BTW you said
"October 16th, 2016 Barrick lost against me the right to quash the injunction C-1912-2001 at SUPREME COURT OF CHILE, at that point, the Fab 10 "associates at Pascua asset" were kicked in their collective assets and sent out packing from SUPREME COURT October 02, 2014. NOT ME, just the sold out associates of the FAB 10 at this board who threatened MSX with buying it and owning it all. For months".
Oh.....YOU WERE "sent packing" PEMANENTLY alright.....maybe you missed this Supreme court ruling??.....DID YOU NOT NOTICE YOUR NAME ON IT?
"Jorge R Lopehandia, is owner of C-1912-2001 Trial and sole party against BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION ad its subsidiaries in Chile at this date 2016."
HMMMM....I thought you said YOU WON C 1912-2001 in 2008? Want me to link to some of your 100 posts that said this before CAT, MTSTACK and I started posting THE REAL DEAL that was happening in the Chilean courts?????
Do you still claim to be the WINNER of C1912-2001 in 2008???? Were you telling lies in those posts or this one where you say the case still exists in 2016????
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
