The answer to your question is pretty straight forward.
puzzled why the co.(Avxl) didn't publicize this.
These were anecdotal observations. They were not a formal part of the study. The numbers were way too small to have any statistical meaning.
There was no formal quantification of the amount of improvement. For example. Did the golfer shoot close to the score that he previously was shooting? Did the piano player start playing chopsticks or complex music at the previous level.
Those questions are unanswered.
It's great the these people felt better enough to go back to previous activities. That is a very positive sign, but without answers to these other questions, it is just an anecdotal observation.
Yes -I included pianist twice instead of saying gofer as I intended... Good ol short term memory and focus issue. Thanks for getting my drift :)
It's not wise to publicize what they can't call scientifically sound. The media got wind of it and gave us some nice exposure and you can be sure that healthcare providers all over the world will be watching for P3 results.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
