Replies to post #351759 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[big-yank]

I agree that the volume of documents is the major contributor to delay after delay. But why did plaintiffs request everything but the kitchen sink if all they really needed was 5 or 10 documents? The plaintiffs dug their own graves with a witch-hunt-of-extreme-excess. The burden this imposes on the court will not go unnoticed by Judge Sweeney. She has already expressed some measure of outrage directed against government resisting release of scantily problematic content. But the big payback for plaintiffs is in the on deck circle, all warmed up and ready for a gametime appearance.

JMHO.

[Donotunderstand]

? of poster and those who know the law

is the below accurate - as cut and copied from Zmarzz

The government is well aware that a sitting judge has to personally review each and every document before it can be released.

?
I ask as Sweeny has already asked for and received - I believe - a sample of 3-4 types of documents protected under 3-4 types of arguments

I FOR ONE THOUGHT THIS WAS HER DECISION PROCESS - SAMPLING

AND IF BASED ON A SAMPLE SHE SAYS YES ---- THE DAM WALLS COME DOWN?