From our experience with the GSE/Government cases, it is very probable that any documents that are protected even by the POTUS, unreleased and are being kept hidden by the court from the record and from the plaintiffs are damaging to the dishonest Government agencies cases. Would we not suspect the same of the Blackrock unreleased documents? I know I do.
Black Rock managed the risk profile data for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac... along with Bear-Stearns and AIG and other notable "players" in the financial crisis era using proprietary super-computer technology called Aladdin. They provided substantial data to Geithner and the U.S. government and this is what the ghouls are drooling over... the possibility that some metric may exist that shows Amendment 3 wasn't necessary. I had hesitated to introduce this topic to the conversation, here, but now that Bradford has rubbed the vase and freed the genie from the bottle, here's what I believe.
1. The documents are legally protectable under all manner of reasons and will NEVER be released by Judge Sweeney.
2. The documents contain matters of absolute national security.
3. The content of the documents is likely to corroborate UST's decision to enact Amendment 3, leaving only the question of the legality of such action as a valid complaint.
Here's a few tidbits on your "twisted/misleading/biased mind" attempt at discrediting someone who may just know a hell of a lot about Fannie Mae that could be useful to investors in FnF shares:
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
