InvestorsHub Logo

corporalagarn

08/31/16 10:22 AM

#271277 RE: senrex #271274

Apparently if you look into the BOD members' eyes, shake their hands, and maybe share a chuckle or two, it's much easier to tolerate the job that they have done with PPHM, 95% pps decline while taking millions in salaries and stipends.

I'll take their word for it as opposed to going to the asm and experiencing the fleecing on my own.

Protector

08/31/16 6:50 PM

#271325 RE: senrex #271274

senrex, because of the NASDAC Listing compliance rules.

CP, I don't have the mental energy at this point to spend an hour or so contradicting your rosy scenario for PPHM (Exosomes, Bavi partnerships, etc.) If that was the case, why do we even need an RS?



We don't per se need the RS if we would become compliant before but otherwise it is the way to regain compliance. Management cannot NOT prepare for the eventuality.