Dont get me wrong...the law IS the law. However, actions and intent by parties is often subjective. In this case, HERA and Conservator laws are objective. But the court must analyze the actions taken by FHFA to determine if they fit within that objective law...and that can sometimes be bent around subjective perspective.
?
But does not the court first have to decide if there is a right for the court to so investigate and decide?
Again, did not LAMBERTH say -- sorry but EXACTLY the above is not a court job given the immunity clause? (the judicial stripping clause in HERA)