Oh, I forgot to mention, in the exercise I proposed in my previous linked post, it is another assumption that PFS for control would not be 24 months (24 months is a given for treatment only). So just take that number and cut it in half (aka: 12 months) for control to be overly conservative.
Again, put that together with the other points I mentioned, and you too may (or may not) come to the conclusion that we should be very near to trial completion. I am not using this exercise to argue that PFS is 24 months, I am simply trying to provide a different perspective regarding trial completion.
As an aside, unless somebody knows of a different reference resource, it looks like the last time NWBIO issued a PR discussing the ongoing partial clinical screening hold, was July 5, 2016. I guess it is arguable they kinda sorta still referenced it indirectly in the 10Q and SEC financing documents, but that seems a stretch. Maybe I missed something.