InvestorsHub Logo

rawman

08/25/16 10:40 AM

#32772 RE: TJG #32770

For BOD member TJG, here is a rather basic concept in reading...NO WHERE IN THE ORDER DOES IT STATE "AND", MEANING THE ORDER ONLY ADDRESSES THE "STAY" ARGUMENT, NOT THE "CHANGE OF VENUE" ARGUMENT! There are two motions, with only one being addressed! Even Johnny C, the PAID TAUG "CONSULTANT", Johnny Cesario, hasn't defended you on this one!

It is very clear that Seth Shaw rewards his "minions" with shareholder monies! Nicely done TJG and Johnny C for being hired by Seth Shaw to do Shaw's bidding! To bad Seth Shaw no longer joins the discussion on this iHub Board! LOL!

diannedawn

08/25/16 11:41 AM

#32778 RE: TJG #32770

OMG... Motion 33.... the motion for the protective order and request to stay discovery is what was denied...
Check the scribd link in my prior post to read that motion...

Show us where on the docket it says the motion to dismiss...that's number 23... Was denied?

"23
06/13/2016 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, by Donald Cowan, Cowan, Gunteski & Co., P.A., William Mylar. Attorney Andrew Lynch Cole added to party Donald Cowan(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Lynch Cole added to party Cowan, Gunteski & Co., P.A.(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Lynch Cole added to party William Mylar(pty:dft). Responses due by 6/30/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Hillsborough County Complaint, # 2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's 10K Securities Filing, # 3 Exhibit C - Florida Secretary of State Entity Search Results, # 4 Affidavit Meyler Declaration with Attachments, # 5 Affidavit Cowan Declaration)(Cole, Andrew). Added MOTION to Change Venue on 6/14/2016 (tpl).
24
06/14/2016 Clerks Notice to Filer re 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, . Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (tpl)
25
06/16/2016 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY by Tauriga Sciences, Inc. (Silverberg, Paul)
26
06/30/2016 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, MOTION to Change Venue by Tauriga Sciences, Inc.. (Silverberg, Paul)
27
06/30/2016 PAPERLESS ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion. Re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, MOTION to Change Venue filed by Cowan, Gunteski & Co., P.A., William Mylar, Donald Cowan. Response due by 7/6/2016. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 6/30/2016. (bkd)
28
07/06/2016 RESPONSE to Motion re 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, MOTION to Change Venue filed by Tauriga Sciences, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of S. Shaw)(Silverberg, Paul) Modified text on 7/7/2016 (tpl).
29
07/15/2016 RESPONSE/REPLY to 28 Reply to Response to Motion, 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, MOTION to Change Venue by Donald Cowan, Cowan, Gunteski & Co., P.A., William Mylar. (Cole, Andrew)
30
07/15/2016 SUPPLEMENT to 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, MOTION to Change Venue to Submit Proposed Order by Donald Cowan, Cowan, Gunteski & Co., P.A., William Mylar (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cole, Andrew)
31
07/15/2016 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Order by Donald Cowan, Cowan, Gunteski & Co., P.A., William Mylar re 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, MOTION to Change Venue (see DE 30 for image) (tpl)
32
07/18/2016 Clerks Notice to Filer re 30 Supplement,. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#31]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (tpl)
33
08/23/2016 MOTION for Protective Order Seeking a Stay of Discovery Pending Resolution of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or in the Alternative to Transfer for Improper Venue by Donald Cowan, Cowan, Gunteski & Co., P.A., William Mylar. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cole, Andrew)
34
08/24/2016 PAPERLESS ORDER denying 33 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 8/24/2016. (bkd)"

Is it a good idea for a BOD member to spread misinformation on a public forum???
ROTFLMAO

diannedawn

09/06/16 4:20 PM

#33011 RE: TJG #32770

Hey Mr. LYING BOD Thomas Graham...
in your so called retraction/"correction" to your blatant LIE stickied above,
you said

What is clear is this:

On Tuesday Aug 23, 2016 section 33, which states "Motion for protective order seeking a Stay of Discover pending the resolution of Defendants motion to dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or in the Alternative to transfer for improper venue by Donald Cowan, Cowan, Gunteski & Co., is denied by paperless order, as stated in section 34.

You can double talk it all you want, but the TRUTH OF THE MATTER is the motion for change of venue is denied, all thats lacking is the official notification. Period, she is denying both the protective order and the change of venue and it will happen no matter what spin you try and put on it...



LMAO...
Date:8/25/2016 9:57:06 AM...
STILL WAITING FOR "OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION"...
WHEN is that going to hit PACER???
Too FUNNY!

diannedawn

10/04/16 9:41 AM

#33960 RE: TJG #32770

Oh Dear! The TRUTH OF THE MATTER is that this was total BULLSHIT.

TJG  
Thursday, 08/25/16 09:57:06 AM
Re: diannedawn post# 32759

Post # of 33873 

Oh...ok what happened to telling the truth...

What is clear is this:

On Tuesday Aug 23, 2016 section 33, which states "Motion for protective order seeking a Stay of Discover pending the resolution of Defendants motion to dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or in the Alternative to transfer for improper venue by Donald Cowan, Cowan, Gunteski & Co., is denied by paperless order, as stated in section 34.

You can double talk it all you want, but the TRUTH OF THE MATTER is the motion for change of venue is denied, all thats lacking is the official notification. Period, she is denying both the protective order and the change of venue and it will happen no matter what spin you try and put on it...



In reality, the case was transferred to NEW JERSEY...
This illustrates why readers should be very careful when picking which sources of information to believe.

Chose to believe the proven LIARS at your own peril...
While Mr. BOD Thomas Graham is busy talking up TAUG's case and saying how "excellent" it is,
he is is also busy SELL SELL SELLING...
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/own-disp?action=getowner&CIK=0001650379

Looks to me like he's just trying to get people to buy the shares he's dumping...lol...


DON'T BE FOOLED!!!
TAUG is a POS with
NO real business...
NO product...
NO revenue...
NOTHING but a shaky lawsuit which has drug on for a year already...
OH...and PLENTY of shares to pass out to insiders and financiers...

"As of August 4, 2016 the registrant had 1,349,270,933 shares of its Common Stock, $0.00001 par value, outstanding"
out of 2,500,000,000 shares A/S...

WAHOO!!!
ROTFLMAO