InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dell_Griffith

08/21/16 5:30 AM

#94447 RE: Watts Watt #94435

Bingo. SQUAT on. Very sound reasoning for the price movements.



Wrong. FALSE. Unsound reasoning and I proved it with FACTS not speculation. A "naked short" suddenly decided to cover on just 700k shares of total volume for a 4k to 8K of profit and perfectly timed it selling at .166 and covered at .125? Not only is it not worth the risk/reward but it's counterintuitive to what a real naked shorter thinks. If they PERFECTLY TIMED it now then they don't think it's going lower?

Where's Harry Markopolous when you need him? Oh well, they didn't believe him either...