Any ISO pain is usually self-inflicted. So many companies come up with complicated, extraordinarily detailed procedures when the exact opposite approach is what should be done if the goal is simply to obtain and maintain ISO without bankrupting oneself.
One can almost (but not quite) get by by saying our procedure and docs are "not to have any."
ISO is as big a fraud and waste of money (though I admit it is necessary to do business in many countries and with some orgs) as climate change and obummercare and any other big government sort of thing.
Ok, I will backpeddle on my earlier Twister criticism. If Bill is ok with Twister than so am I, not that anyone cares - and no one should.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
