InvestorsHub Logo

Donotunderstand

08/15/16 6:45 PM

#349675 RE: big-yank #349650

agree to disagree

if what is found "wrong" is the THIRD AMENDMENT then I see no reason for money to go to F and F and then out to preferred holders as cumulative arrears dividends

NOW if the entire shooting match is found illegal - wow - then all bets are off .......... but then we all be rich

Again if the interest rate of ALL is found insane and unjust - I do not see why F and F that need capital would take the money coming to them and declare a dividend

If all preferred are to be at same time - then you are arguing beyond what the plaintiff is arguing - which is back to the first 10% dividend and that simply is not in this case