InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 28126
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/28/2008

Re: big-yank post# 349650

Monday, 08/15/2016 6:45:33 PM

Monday, August 15, 2016 6:45:33 PM

Post# of 797221
agree to disagree

if what is found "wrong" is the THIRD AMENDMENT then I see no reason for money to go to F and F and then out to preferred holders as cumulative arrears dividends

NOW if the entire shooting match is found illegal - wow - then all bets are off .......... but then we all be rich

Again if the interest rate of ALL is found insane and unjust - I do not see why F and F that need capital would take the money coming to them and declare a dividend

If all preferred are to be at same time - then you are arguing beyond what the plaintiff is arguing - which is back to the first 10% dividend and that simply is not in this case