InvestorsHub Logo

SmallBuy

08/06/16 2:52 PM

#71225 RE: NCAR #71219

This is the most fun speculation I have ever entertained.... Lol

As far as patents go this one is a definitive win no matter what.

The "discovery" and following procedure "may" reduce the damages if they have good enough attorneys.

but there is no way this case is lost without a priority date earlier than 2000 for a very similar idea.

no chance.

if you read the patent. It will apply to everything OOB/multifactor with a biometric type authentication

https://www.google.com/patents/US7870599?dq=PATENT+No.:+US+7,870,599+B2&ei=uBs4Tp7TMOLs0gG14PzNAw#v=onepage&q=PATENT%20No.%3A%20US%207%2C870%2C599%20B2&f=false


This patent wins something in every case...

Its too beefy and has 2 much clout in the contemporary IT and security fields... There is no way to argue out of this patent by anyone using biometrics for authentication... NONE.

QUOTE from patent
*************************************************************
This is in contradistinction to present authentication processes as the out-of-band security network 40 is isolated from the corporate network 38 and does not depend thereon for validating data. The first shows a biometric validation which, in this case, is in the form of voice recognition and is within voice network 42. While voice recognition is used herein, it is merely exemplary of many forms of recognizing or identifying an individual person. Others include, but are not limited to fingerprint identification, iris recognition, retina identification, palms recognition, and face recognition. Each of these are similar to the first embodiment in that these are a requirement for monitoring the particular parameter of the individual person; including the parameter to a mathematical representation or algorithm therefore; retrieving a previously stored sample (biometric data), thereof from a database and comparing the stored sample with the input of the accessor.

Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments herein detailed in accordance with the descriptive requirement of the law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
***************************************************************
any large bank or financial institution....
any large tech firm that has intricate server rooms
even Cern/google with their Quantum computers use biometrics im 100% on that.

SO many companies are using this patent.

and most of them likely contracted to another company like Centrify or Trustwave for example

THEse 3 lawsuits people keep down playing them but I believe our Buyout could happen even before getting 2 Google.

The companies listed by Centrify/Duo/Trustwave have the potential to cause a formal buyout so large we may never get 2 further lawsuits.... But who knows

I do not believe Google setup their own OOB biometrics for security.
But I dont know for sure.

Either way.. StrikeForce has the Ace patent and the litigation process is not going to be drug out simply because the lawsuits are so overarching and all encompassing.

There is very little chance IMO that any of these companies Go to court for long periods of time once they realize they are not the only infringers that are liable.

Buyout is my hope..... and the DD still supports "traditional" revenue coupled with settlements




*****************************

Lol its about as speculative as saying opposable digits are for grasping things.

https://www.google.com/patents/US7870599?dq=PATENT+No.:+US+7,870,599+B2&ei=uBs4Tp7TMOLs0gG14PzNAw#v=onepage&q=PATENT%20No.%3A%20US%207%2C870%2C599%20B2&f=false

Read the Patent.

Understand the application.

And try to imagine a company using security without using a separate distinct disparate networks to authorize..... You cant.

Therefore Multifactor.
Therefore Out of Band

Then try to imagine billion dollar companies not utilizing Biometrics to secure sensitive data/areas.... you cant

Therefor Biometrics


Now try to imagine a court case that can win if you use these three in conjunction and do not infringe upon said patent.... you cant

Therefore win/settlement/buyout

MESS WITH THE BULLS GET THE HORNS!

\