This info was posted a while back. The other follow up links also contain info that was previously revealed.
The injunction requested by VSL initially received approval, as referenced in this link, because MAXD did not respond (with injunctions, the defendent is guilty until proven innocent.) There was some strategy by MAXD behind that, though I'm not sure of the details.
As it stands now, to the best of my understanding, the injunction request by VSL is set aside, and the request by MAXD to have the case dismissed (sic) is also set aside, at the legal parties request, while they engage in discussions or negotiations of some sort.
We aren't privy to the nature of the discussions, but my own experience sees this as a good thing, in that plaintiff to defendent negotiations usually accelerate the legal process time line.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
