InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bud Powell

07/28/16 11:08 PM

#71142 RE: Diamondhands45 #71139

Even if it were true, at this point in time it's just your opinion and inflammatory. I would like to think a good Doctor wouldn't resort to such antics.

Avxl orchestrated a charade for months with data that wasn't good. Just like macfarlane did with pran

icon url

powerwalker

07/29/16 7:32 AM

#71175 RE: Diamondhands45 #71139

I agree with Amateur's post #71168, except the stinking bid/buyout part.

We have wanted to hear how 2-73 works and though it alone was give to only 7 (max) active participants, we know that given a 6 month period, it begins to show its positive capabilities. Dr. Mac stated that the pianist, painter and golfer did not begin to show their skills until they had been on 2-73 for 8 months or more. Though not noted by him, the data I think indicates that they were taking only 2-73.

The small size hurts credibility (was it a anomaly?) but it still presents results that are fantastic. As I noted before, I hope that all have been switched to 2-73 only and, if such, a PR should be released ... in fact, a PR on the current dosing status is in order, because if they haven't been switched, it begs the question: "Why would all participants be interested in continuing through the two extensions?"
icon url

gburgin

07/29/16 9:24 AM

#71216 RE: Diamondhands45 #71139

"Avxl orchestrated a charade for months..... "

For what purpose? Neither the leadership nor the company itself
sold shares into the "supposed" charade. I don't buy it.