Replies to post #67829 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[kabunushi]

It's possible that they would be calculating their news release strategy to prevent him from buying a lot more shares at these prices.

[maverick_1]

Took some time off for another of my investments and to watch wrapup by Hillary vs my identical response that Mayor Bloomberg voiced about the Donald:"

I'm a NY'er and I can see a Con artist

Any chance that NWBO has been silent for so long to prevent Woodford, assuming he signed a NDA, from selling his shares? TIA

.Although I do not agree with your statement since I truly find it hard to believe that CEO Linda Powers has that as a key motivation.

OK, lets put BOTH (Neil Woodford; Linda Powers) different personalities aside and consider how it should be thought out:

1.Realistically, Woodford even IF he harbored the thought of selling his position: HE COULD NOT without DAMAGING his own investment record let alone his own expressed views of being a long term investor and what Woodford stated he sees in NWBO. Unlike the individual investor or those fully dedicated BioTec investors to the sector, Woodford is DIVERSIFIED. Moreover, if Woodford sold he would cause dissension within his shareholder base. As I've stated, IMHO Neil Woodford did NOT do his BASIC Due Diligence/or shrugged it off concerning the setup of NWBO/Cognate re CEO Linda Powers going on thirteen year ordeal of going from the Angel Investor in bailing out NWBO beginning in 2004 to being CEO 2009 (NWBO WAS Mismanaged!) to NOW 2016 needing some form of Angel Investor/BigRx lic/ptrshp. Woodford clearly made a MAJOR judgement error in under estimating the shrewdness of Manipulators moves by doing havoic to Navid Malik on NWBO's Bd of Director to also getting to Woodford's investors via not only Phase V tome but also to lots of UK media, just like in the US. Note, I witnessed how they operate DIRECTLY.. so it did NOT come as a surprise to me (FACT vs perception issue of readers saying Pompousness: and certainly in person I am not ego driven just in pursuit of the truth and logic.). So, not surprisingly Woodford succumbed, while CEO Linda Powers doubled upping Woodford in: 1)her more qualified additions to the Board of Directors as well as 2) the Ambassador Black to led the Investigation to Alleged Stock Price Manipulation.

2. Hold that last thought for this:In the back of my mind, if CEO Linda Powers had the option (and I do NOT know what they are) she'd be in a better position IMHO by attracting other world class biotec investors (think about the recent choice of Chardan Capital and my post)to limit her exposure to Woodford funds given the monkey wrench the latter threw in to upset and add a major distraction since late 2015 to CEO Linda Powers life and ours. Like Hillary Clinton, Linda Powers is also a Harvard Law School Magna Cum Laude graduate. Both are stronger undergoing a CRISIS whereas Woodford has less urgency given his portfolio diversity.

[Reefrad]

Very smart idea