InvestorsHub Logo

hedge_fun

07/24/16 6:09 AM

#47967 RE: Seriously123 #47961

Then the Judge told him that HUFFMAN was correct in how he filed the "no show" on Kyle last deposition.



This is what the Judge said. Not sure what you saw different than this from page 33.

14 He's not supposed to just not show up and

15 file a protective order.


This is what was filed by Kyle/Craig.

06/13/2016 NOTICE OF NON-AVAILABILITY
FOR DEPOSITION PENDING SANCTION MOTIONS AND PROTECTION BEFORE COURT

So Craig and Brendan were ready for the deposition, huh?

Interesting.....

hedge_fun

07/24/16 4:42 PM

#47977 RE: Seriously123 #47961

When deposed, will Kyle name the archaeologist....

who "allegedly" found gold coins on Area 2? That claim was made in the original complaint.

Will Kyle provide the environmental permits, if they actually have them mentioned in the last PR?

Will Kyle provide the 3 item agreement Seafarers "allegedly" had for Area 2?

Will Kyle provide documentation the platters contained the name of the Captain's wife, as they "alleged" in the original complaint?

Will/did Kyle provide the ClearTrust documents he said he would, and were "allegedly" available at past hearings?

I would ask for these documents to be available just as the FBAR provided nearly 3000 pages of documents related to Seafarers.

That shouldn't be a problem, correct?

Kyle's happy to do it, isn't he?

Ahhhh.....discovery! It's a mechanism designed to make folks think twice about filing frivolous lawsuits.