Yes, and I know I've pointed this out before but no signal of cognitive improvement is NOT a "bad" result at 26 weeks. It would be "not bad" and just mean that our goal shifts exclusively to disease stability at longer time frames, eg: at 52 weeks. Which is one of several reasons why I am enthused by the Part B extensions. They were huge for us (and no-brainers).
And to pre-empt some folks I guess I should also state that I am not saying the results on Wednesday will be "not bad". I think we will have efficacy signals on most test batteries, some solid.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
