InvestorsHub Logo

SmallBuy

07/22/16 3:28 PM

#64588 RE: wolf1991 #64579

I already explained this.

There are two companies facing treble damages.

One of which was recently "valued" at 780Mil via an acquisition. (price paid)

this company also has over 200Mil in revenues in fiscal 2014.
This company also has 15 years of patent infrinements since 2000. They are being sought FOR WILLFUL and INTENTIONAL infringement. TREBLE damages.

The Buyer of this company (trustwave/singapore) has just invested 780million into a company they CANNOT gain profit from without a "WIN" "SETTLEMENT" or BUYOUT

They are invested 1x 780 million

Centrify has TONS more damages per year based on clientel ALONE.

Centrify in order to WIN a BUYOUT has to be willing to meet SINGAPORE/TRUSTWAVE which is ALREADY in for 780 mil.

Singapore CAN AFFORD to LOSE 2x "damages" which is likely GREATER than 780Mil (but we can use 780mil for benefit of the doubt) Because a LOSS in court is going to be 3x (and they already paid 1x last year during acquisition)

Centrify will likely have to reach at least a 2x valuation for damages in order to meet the "buyout proposal"

Neither company can affor 5x(trustwave) or (6xCentrify) by acquiring the other.

SINGAPORE must take 780 mil in loses or WIN in COURT or Settle and take 780mil +settlement in loses WITH ZERO POTENTIAL for profit from recent acquisition.

Centrify must get a BUYOUT or SETTLE or face Losing 3x damages.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.38 is the LOWEST possible outcome provided all three cases are solid IN A BUYOUT ATTEMPT

Duo will settle they have much less incentive to meet 2x-3x damages buyout war.

IF A BUYOUT DOES NOT OCCUR we WIN 3 settlements and continue to file more lawsuits.