InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MoneyForNuthin

07/04/16 2:34 PM

#23127 RE: Davis_Elite #23077

Did everyone see this link Davis posted?!? I read this when it was passed around to a few boards in December (the post made by DFLY). I think DFLY was spot-on with this. Hastily written as DFLY mentioned, but a good read for all here.

But first, I mentioned in an earlier post that I see some good in this. The reason is that first, I have only higher confidence after seeing all of these tricks played and the price has been holding very well. Yes, there have been large swings in this channel but, as you will see here, most of this is just "presentation" by the manipulators. Second, it seems very possible that some of this has been enjoyed by shareholders who are simply doing whatever they can to accumulate as many shares as possible. Sentiment is very high and Jan has attracted strong-holding longs. I believe we'll be seeing many more joining us when the price begins the breakout run.

"IMPORTANT:OTC Algorithm Manipulation-Must read and watch on L2s across otcland.. "
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119091161

Note where DFLY writes the following, and then look at the screen shots below of the PGEI trades for 6/29 & 6/30:


This is different than what weve witnessed in the past as otc markets and electronic trading is adapting/growing. Not hard to see once one pins down the algorithm cpu bs etc. Weird trades on many plays across the boards 10200s 20400s 200s 100s are a few signs. Not just someone painting here and there most the time etc.

...

Im tryin to scramble to write this as im crunched for time lol. I wanted to add also if see weird 5-6 digit prints ie 00663 trade too and or along with the 10200s 20400s 40800s 200s 100s one can really see whats up first hand as well. Not just dilution trades at those extra decimal places. Most think it is at this point. Or one will also see the notorious cdel nite 10k offers that wont go away after hit multiple times. As well as immedietly down ticking or bid hitting following purchases. Sure sometimes those offers and sells are indeed dilution etc but lately its been happening on most every company ive seen so far in otcland.

The way to really see the light is when it happens on companies that have ZERO dilution. Then one can really see whats happening if using etrade to purchase shares or just if the majority of shares in a particular stock have a concentrated etrade position there. Which most do as etrade is the most popular broker nowadays accounting for the bulk of otc retail trades. It is a algorithm whom is selling phantoms and taking advantage of us retail traders/investors IMO via etrade and certain mms/clearing firms(Citadel mm cdel IMO which is evident if one watches this happen first hand)! But it is a flawed algo! Seen some algos pop up few years back but now it has been evolving like mad in this arena. Similar to high frequency algos on big boards. It is definitely wrong and to me seems highly illegal they can do this. Using it against us traders/investors as well as against most every companies well being. Holding companies down and playing with inventory they never really had to begin with. If someone starts buying a stock thru ones etrade and mysteriously all this extra stock shows up via those certain mms I mentioned then is easy to see it happen. As well as same amounts hitting bids and being offered as have mentioned too. Few different tell tale signs of this once one sees the light. And then the games begin.
Almost similar to what happened with the naked shorting of Overstock years ago. They fought hard to beat them and eventually did after a tough battle. That was from naked shorting and subsequent covering that took place when they were forced to come up with all that stock they toyed with. Can dig into lots of articles about Overstock and whats happening in otcland across the board is similar. With few more KEY elements at play of an adapting/changing/evolving computerized robotic, naked shorting, phantom selling program imo(get it?lol).

My take is the algos take it for granted that most will sell out for losses at some point if a stock dont move up much in the short term after one buys. Or this algo gets their stock back cheaper from other avenues ie dilution/toxic stuff that hits these markets on a regular basis. Sometimes then they are able to even out their books intraday instead of over days,weeks,months. This can indeed be broken via a company catalyst hitting especially if non etrade retailers come in and or if they get caught messing around too much and are forced to get inventory back in general. Been some huge runs that this did indeed occur. Also to note sometimes their inventory from day before they supposedly had stacked on offers disappears off the offers the following days mysteriously after messing around like mad days prior. Its insane.


It takes a little bit of time and effort, but if you really want to understand what's going on with the recent PGEI manipulation, I think it's all right here in the images below.

Note the highlighted trades in the images below, and note also my observation of the action on Thursday (6/30) at EOD when someone slapped the ask for 900,000 shares (the last three trades showing, at 15:48) - apparently a limit order at 0.0054 or higher that cleared the 0.0051 offer and a large part of an offer at 0.0054. Immediately after this an offer appeared on the ask at 0.0052. Who does this in the middle of buying action? And who reacts so quickly to such a buy order to drop the ask within seconds?!? Answer: manipulative MMs/algorithms and/or possibly traders piggybacking (or emulating) the MM algorithms.

Do these purported MM algorithms actually exist, running on the servers of CDEL, NITE and possibly other MMs? Yes, this is possible. Wouldn't this be illegal activity? Maybe, maybe not. Unfortunately, it seems that MMs are given quite a bit latitude to "make the market." Is it possible that Ken Griffin, founder and CEO of Citadel (CDEL) (who topped Forbes magazine's list of the highest-earning hedge fund managers, making $1.7B in 2015 alone) would risk his fortune, civil liberties and personal freedom in this way? Yes, this is possible. Anyone here ever heard of Bernie Madoff? Allen Stanford? Jeffrey Skilling (think 'Enron')? Ivan Boesky? Jordan Belfort (does 'The Wolf of Wall Street' sound familiar)?

Or is it possible that one or more traders or groups of traders are "emulating" such algorithms? The answer is yes, it's possible, I have no doubt. Not only is it possible, but I believe it is very likely.

- Exclusive: U.S. investigates market-making operations of Citadel, KCG - only indirectly related to the manipulation, but good that they're being investigated, I expect that it could bring enough attention that CDEL may adjust and tone down the manipulations soon. And this quote below from the article looks pretty interesting:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks-probe-exclusive-idUSKCN0Y11CJ

Citadel and KCG are among several firms being examined in a separate probe by the New York State Attorney General. New York authorities are examining firms that buy and sell the flow of trading orders placed by investors, according to a person familiar with that investigation. The authorities are also looking at other practices in the world of high-speed stock trading that may disadvantage retail investors. Citadel and KCG declined to comment on that inquiry.



- NITE (KCG) selling DMM business to CDEL. Unclear to me exactly whether this includes the Market Making business for OTC stocks, it would probably be good for OTC traders if that were the case, IMO.
http://investors.kcg.com/mobile.view?c=105070&v=202&d=3&id=aHR0cDovL2FwaS50ZW5rd2l6YXJkLmNvbS9maWxpbmcueG1sP2lwYWdlPTEwNzgzNjY1JkRTRVE9MSZTRVE9MzQmU1FERVNDPVNFQ1RJT05fUEFHRSZleHA9JnN1YnNpZD01Nw%3D%3D

As of December 31, 2015, our operating segments comprised the following:

Market Making— Our Market Making segment principally consists of market making in the cash, futures and options markets across global equities, options, fixed income, currencies and commodities. As a market maker, we commit capital on a principal basis by offering to buy securities from, or sell securities to, broker dealers, banks and institutions. Principal trading in the Market Making segment primarily consists of direct-to-client and non-client exchange-based electronic market making, including trade executions conducted as an equities Designated Market Maker (“DMM”) on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and NYSE Amex Equities ("NYSE Amex"). We are an active participant on all major global equity and futures exchanges and also trade on substantially all domestic electronic options exchanges. As a complement to electronic market making, our cash trading business handles specialized orders and also transacts on the OTC Bulletin Board marketplaces operated by the OTC Markets Group Inc. and the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange ("AIM")

On February 4, 2016, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Citadel Securities LLC (“Citadel”), pursuant to which we agreed to sell our NYSE DMM business to Citadel. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of 2016. See "Subsequent Events" included later in this section for further details.



- Here's another one: "The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to financial services firms trying to fend off allegations that they facilitate illegal short selling"
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-17/wall-street-faces-new-front-for-lawsuits-after-top-court-ruling

You can learn which market makers are used most frequrently by which brokers by looking at their SEC Rule 606 Report. Here are some examples:
TD Ameritrade: https://www.tdameritrade.com/retail-en_us/resources/pdf/AMTD2054.pdf
Scottrade: https://www.scottrade.com/documents/alt/SSICSECRule606Report.pdf

And if you want to know something about the Market Makers, you can go to http://www.level2stockquotes.com/market-makers-c-list.html (this is the page for MMs starting with "C" so you can see Citadel (CDEL) here).







The highlights in the 6/30 trades record is particularly interesting because I have the full day's trades and can draw a connection between the uncharacteristic dumps (dumping while action is trending with "buys"), the 'coded' binary multiple buy orders (10200, 10200, 20400, 408000 & 81600) and the 6-digit "dump" print (1,000,000 @ 0.004842). It goes like this:

1) dump 450000 at 0.0049 (12:13)
...
2) dump 710,000 shares at 0.0045 (12:29)
...
3) binary walkup of buy orders from 10,200 to 81,600 shares at 0.0049 (12:54, total of 163,200 shares)
...
4) "cleanup" dump of 1,000,000 shares at 0.004842 (15:21)

Here's the formula:

'working trades' = 'cleanup trades'

-450000 - 710000 + 163200 = 996800

This balances perfectly! ...with only 1000000 - 996800 = 3200 shares of 'discrepancy'. 3200 shares is well within the margin of transaction costs, fees and/or even simple MM 'housekeeping' adjustments.

There are a number of explanations for why, what and who, but here is one plausible scenario that could involve a MM, a trader, a trader group or any combination:

1) dump shares to self or partner bid (MM or trader)
... wait to see if the desired retail action follows
...
... no one selling, try again
2) dump more shares to self or partner bid approaching double the size of the first dump
... wait to see if THIS causes the desired retail action
...
... oops, no takers, better try to cleanup before intraday momentum shifts out of favor (e.g. good news drops or a wise 'whale' investor or group recognizes the action and makes one or more large buys to effectively 'squeeze' these short-like dump trades)
3) make small buy orders at an acceptable price and in small increments so as not to lose money agaist the price of the previous dumps by pushing the price up too quickly
4) make the cleanup dump that balances accounts (self or between partners) or effectively covers the short-like postion (this could very easily be a true naked short position if it is a MM)

If nothing else, any investigations into MM and/or broker activities could lead to access to data which could bring to light any clear and obvious abuses of 'latitude given to MMs for making the market'. If I can put these pieces together for a single limited example using a calculator and everyday public information, just think what 'big data' can do - and then think what big data can do with access to information to which I am not privvy.

FYI, I didn't get complete trade records for certain days, but I downloaded some records of by-the-minute trade volume and connected some dots. You can see in the following image the same pattern over several days last week. And LOOK at the volume percentage of these fake dumps (from one account to another, either MM or trader)!