InvestorsHub Logo

Stock_Barber

06/28/16 3:32 PM

#107865 RE: TradeForProfits #107864

Something stated in a DBMM PR is anything BUT fact...







JoeB68

06/28/16 6:32 PM

#107870 RE: TradeForProfits #107864

Incorrect? This whole damn company is incorrect. And all of the IR reps past and present SUCK! lololol.
Couldn't even keep this turd up long enough to make salary for Linda and Reggie fresh off of a R/S
They should get their money back from IR.

jhnvtjll

06/28/16 9:32 PM

#107871 RE: TradeForProfits #107864

It's believable because their PR stated it?

How about this one from 3 years ago?

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/digital-brand-media--marketing-group-inc-ready-to-move-forward-204500781.html

"NEW YORK, LOS ANGELES and LONDON, April 24, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Digital Brand Media Marketing Group, Inc. (OTCQB: DBMM) has concluded all of its regulatory requirements after many months. Plans can move forward now that the Company is structured properly financially and is up to date in its fully reporting public company status. The Board of Directors can now move ahead."



Once they file the 10-K, I bet they'll say the same thing, that they can now move forward.



otterman

06/28/16 11:23 PM

#107873 RE: TradeForProfits #107864

In PR company can say anything, true or not. It's NR or filings that counts and of that there is none. In other words, PR is nothing but speculation, conjecture, and hopes.

There, now I'll only have to explain it 98 more times.

Arnold25764

06/29/16 1:47 AM

#107881 RE: TradeForProfits #107864

Thanks for clearing that up bro!! We know what's coming!! Huge 10k filing! GO $DBMM!!! imo