InvestorsHub Logo

Boatswain

06/15/16 8:12 AM

#47067 RE: hedge_fun #47066

With what you attached disproves your statment that there was no permit request. Mary specific states "Your requests for permits in areas 1 and 3 will not be addressed until reporting for area 2 meets the above terms and standards. "

In addition, this was a period of one month (30 days). Since it was posted that Mary stated SFRX has permits in processmof approval then I would take it as the reports are corrected.

Which brings be back to my last post. Are you cherry picking what you post? Where are the corrected reports. On Nov 6 Mary states there are 2 reports and with the time another one should have been submitted. So now there are 3 Reports. Post those and lets see what they are saying to the State about what they are finding.

nodummy

06/15/16 11:32 AM

#47083 RE: hedge_fun #47066

Number 5 from that letter bears repeating. Especially the part about Kyle being a bully and about shareholder questions being reasonable (not something to be suing people over)

https://www.scribd.com/doc/315780399/Kyle-Wanted-a-Meeting-March-2016


"I listened to 30 minutes of Kennedy apologizing for all the investors and other inquiries into his company (e.g. Farmer) and how he is suing all of them, yet the questions have been reasonable. My impression is that these are veiled threats, and if we do not fall into line, he will sue us. He threatened Roger last summer and is trying to bully us now."



Sure speaks a lot about the type of character Kyle Kennedy is. If he doesn't get his way he just threatens people and tries to bully them.




Boatswain

06/22/16 2:25 PM

#47224 RE: hedge_fun #47066

I am replying to one of your earlier post that has a link you posted about SFRX Suspension. This letter is dated Nov 6, 2015. Last year.

In the letter from Mary it state's in the 2nd paragraph

"Your requests in areas 1 and 3 will not be addressed until reporting for area 2 meets the above terms and standards."

Now let us contemplate this statement FROM MARY.

1. Last year SFRX did have requests for permits in Area 1 and 3. So the ones submitted in March of this year must have been resubmissions.

2. The terms and standards must have been met on their reports or Mary would not have stated that there is a permit for Area 1 in review.

You have also posted a email between herself and her boss from this year that SFRX has a current permit in area 2 and from the posts that have the permit linked in it, it doesn't expire until Jun of 2017.

As for shipwreck material. POST THE 3 OR MORE REPORTS SO WE CAN SEE IF THEY ARE FINDING SHIPWRECK MATERIAL.