InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

thora001

06/07/16 6:39 PM

#49858 RE: Dirtwoof #49856

I know they've considered the commons. If you notice an insider holds hundreds of millions of shares with warrants to buy a ton more. Im not trying to sway anyone's opinion and in fact I was not the one who suggested the reasoning, I simply repeated his idea.

You're going to be amazed at some of the players who are involved with hybrid. That does not mean current shareholders will benefit (although I believe we will), but there are huge things going on, imo.

Long $HCTI
icon url

OTC Whisperer

06/07/16 10:45 PM

#49892 RE: Dirtwoof #49856

This I agree with, management does not care about who owns the shares, so long as they were sold they already got what the shares were intended for, money for fundraising. Weak hands or not, they already got what they wanted out of the transaction
icon url

blackshirej

06/07/16 11:18 PM

#49897 RE: Dirtwoof #49856

It's not a tactic that will only benefit the common shareholders as I will agree, they're not doing anything specifically to help us small peons get rich.

It has been stated that they have investors interested but they are concerned about the low share prices and manipulation.

So how do you put that behind you? Shake the traders out, leaving mostly the crazy longs. Once they're out, reverse split and drop a bombshell PR (or an A/S reduction).

Kaboom.

PPS looks much better then. Traders who chased got in but the rest were left on the bid expecting a 40% haircut. With the right news the traders who managed to get in might opt to hold. Or they keep dropping PRs and the traders sell only to see the price going in the wrong direction--up.

Remember they have a shareholder/creditor who owns approx half or more of the float based on estimates along with warrants to purchase even more shares. His shares and warrants will be rolled back too. Do you REALLY think they're going to want to dilute the crap out of the stock causing his investment to lose 40% or more of its value?

I think they have something else up their sleeves...and I think as long as their shareholder/creditor is around, the common shareholders will benefit as long as he's benefitting.