Replies to post #4058 on Arcam AB fka AMAVF

[Tom Joad]

That's a lot of conclusion from a little.

[pdb2]

Hey trader, more shouts about your conclusions based on your solid premises. Lets check your documented record. Arcam was gong to 10 and below the Leap train had left the station and now you post that the leap is back in the picture, composites would leap frog EBM, arcam would get no GE bulk orders, than we would sell 1000s in a yeqr, then bleak again, EBAM and every competitor you read about would pose destructive competition to arcam, you conclude based on what you see or don't see in a video, you shout that arcam would have poor sales based on no announcements as we got 19 in q4, etc, etc, etc. LOL. You even presume to understand the pps movements shouting that you sold at 21 and now 27, of course after the stock has made a move and presume to understand and anticipate what companies will do regarding their manufacturing processes and needs. Heck you shouted that the leap was in full production, to support your leap train had left the station argument, based on the shouted fact that 30 engines had been produced. LOL. All in your yahoo and other posting records.

Now you presume to predict how long a leap engine will serve as if that is not based on individual usage and manufacture choices. LOL You also presume to draw conclusions based on that guess of yours re how and when arcam blades will be used. Never mind that real volume production has not started, that engine replaceents will depend on individual corporate decisions and individual usages and never mind that the leap is still under development such as there is consideration of even introducing a new version of the leap to enlarge the 737 plane, possibly using the airbus version of the leap.

Bottom line trader your making conclusions on weak premises and yor guessing is flawed at best and explains why you have been wrong so often. tired of seeing all these conclusionary shouts and opinions, and telling of all your actions and ideas, when they are based on flawed premises. Why not wait till you know something before you opine. Bottom line, you have no idea of how long a leap will be in play whether GE will modify the leap In process to accommodate EBM blades or how many or when ebm parts will be needed on the leap, other engines or the basic airframe as you have no idea what corporate decisions the part and airplane manufacturers are being made.

What I do know is that GE has opted for EBm blades per their own statements and printer procurement, other parts manufactures and mainframe manufacturers are investigating and opting for EBM parts and rene has stated that arcam would have trouble keeping up with aerospace demand. Those are facts and not conclusions based on false premises or guesses. What we do not know, but i'm positive about, is how many printers and how much material this will result in and when. But as I said when you first raised the above shouts, ebm will have a place in the equation and the jury is still out and conclusionary shouts are simply foolish and premature.