Replies to post #43999 on Bitzio, Inc. (fka BTZO)

[iSmellCrickets]

Very simple explanation

As Kevin could easily be headed toward acquiring tangible assets. No other reason I can see for such loan terms. They have very little time left this year to pay the loan back, or be liquidated.

Not to mention the tax write off in so many ways I can't imagine. Then allowing said assets to be claimed as part of the patent suit GERS will lose upon appeal, if even taken up.

As noticed by everyone else, shareholders are of no concern in this matter. None. Just a means to stay 'legit' within the regulations by public offerings.

[ShoeGlue]

Your btzo arguments are based on your own exaggerated interpretation of everyone else's very plain english, in their personal opinions. Sorry, but the majority of your arguments are against figments of your own imagination, not btzo. Focus on BTZO and the facts, not on arguing with fellow board users, or... dare I say... shareholders. Many of us are. JMO. GLTU. GO BTZO!!!